Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Amy Berkowitz's avatar

Yikes! That’s fucking vile.

Kind of wonder if the sensitivity reader raised some of these issues and the author just ignored the feedback.

Gray's avatar

I had to look up this author because I'm nosy and have opinions about doctors based on their specialties. (It's not universal, but there's definitely Types of Guy that are attracted to each one.)

First: horrified that this woman lives in proximity to me and of course is an assistant professor at Tufts. Ew. Gross. 0/10. Also not surprised that both of her parents were doctors and that she went to Harvard for undergrad.

Second: shattered that she's basically a physiatrist who helps people with brain disorders regain function. Not only is that an incredibly delicate position to be in as a patient with a vile doctor, but physiatrists aren't generally known to be the raging assholes of the medical field due to their more holistic approaches and proximity to PTs and OTs. What must she think of her struggling patients? Does she find them as disgusting as she clearly does psychiatric patients? Or are their ailments "acceptable" because they're (probably) classified as neurological and not psychiatric? (SO many conditions are under the purview of both, and some have crossed over from psychiatry to neurology as we've gained further understanding of them...)

I'm also just...SO curious about the sensitivity reader. Are they bound by an NDA to not come forward and criticize the book if the author ignored their suggestions? Are they just as unscrupulous as the author herself? Who the hell is this person whose existence and involvement is being used as a shield against critique? I don't know much about the innards of the publishing industry, so maybe some of this is just common knowledge, but sheesh.

I'm grateful for you writing this and speaking out. People, whether professionals or amateurs, are truly their worst selves in the reviews of books involving mental illness. I once read an amazing, gripping graphic memoir (The Third Person by Emma Grove) that had many shit reviews on Goodreads because people had the gall to type "I didn't think the trauma she divulged was bad enough to cause DID" and "it wasn't as dramatic as I wanted it to be given the topic of DID." Who are the real "monsters" here??

19 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?